Saturday, September 20, 2025

Airlines Foundation Part 3: Airlines Network Strategy, Partnerships, and Alliances

When we refer to airlines strategy, network is certainly fundamental – Where an airline flies, how often, and with what aircraft.

Networks don’t stand alone. They are amplified by partnerships and alliances that expand reach, build loyalty, and shape competition.

In this post, I will explore: Network strategy, Partnerships and Alliances



Network Strategy

Airline network strategy is part of the deliberate design.

It is the most visible manifestation of an airline’s strategy: customers do not see balance sheet or yield curves – they see routes, schedules, and connectivity.

Airlines design networks around three big questions:

1.       Where to play?

a.       Domestic dominance, regional focus, or global connector

b.       Ultra-long-haul “marathon” flights vs short-haul frequency

2.       How to structure the network?

a.       Hub-and-spoke – Concentrate flights through hubs to aggregate traffic

b.       Point-to-point – Direct routes between city pairs, often with narrowbodies.

c.       Hybrid: A mix of both. Example: Delta (hub banks + point to point in the US

3.       How to align Fleet?

a.       Widebodies (A350, B787, B777) for long-haul trunk routes.

b.       Narrowbodies (A320neo, B737Max, A220) for regional/dense domestic.

c.       Emerging A321XLR enabling “long-thin” point-to-point routes

Impact of Network strategy choices:

1.       Hub-and-Spoke Vs Point-to-Point

Hub-and-Spoke: Concentrates traffic through major airports

·       Impact: Increases connectivity, fills widebodies efficiently, supports premium hubs

·       Implication: Vulnerable to hub congestion and disruption; relies heavily on transfer passengers

Point-to-Point: Focuses on direct routes, often high-frequency with narrowbodies

·       Impact: Simpler operations, faster turns, lower cost, customer convenience

·       Implication: Requires dense origin & Destination demand; less global reach

Hybrid: Mix of both models

·       Impact: Flexibility to balance local demand and long-haul connections

·       Implication: Higher complexity; must avoid identity confusion

 

2.       Domestic Vs International Orientation

Domestic-heavy networks (Southwest, Indigo)

·       Lower regulatory exposure, stable demand, higher frequency

·       Vulnerable to local economic swings and LCC competition

International/global connectors (Emirates, Singapore, Turkish)

·       Global reach, premium yields, diversified demand flow

·       Vulnerable to geopolitical risks, bilateral restrictions, fuel volatility

 

3.       Fleet Alignment

Widebody-focused networks (Emirates)

·       Long-haul reach, premium product, cargo strength

·       High capital intensity , reliance on transfer hubs.

Narrowbody-focused networks (Ryanair, Indigo)

·       Cost efficiency, frequency, democratized access

·       Limited long-haul potential; revenue capped by stage length.

Mixed fleets (Delta, Lufthansa)

·       Balance of flexibility and global reach

·       Greater cost and operational complexity

 

4.       Stage Length and Frequency decisions

Ultra-long-haul

·       Differentiates with non-stop convenience

·       Small niche, high fuel/crew costs, risky if demand softens

High-frequency short-haul (Ryanair, ANA domestic)

·       Convenience and dominance in local markets

·       Thin margins, competitive vulnerability

One of the biggest bottlenecks in the aviation industry today is the timely delivery of aircraft. An aircraft is built from plethora of parts sourced from multitude of suppliers worldwide (Engines from GE/Rolls-Royce/Pratt & Whitney, Avionics, Composites, Interiors). Every plane must meet rigorous safety and certification standards (FAA, EASA, CAAC). Throughput from the final assembly lines (Toulouse for Airbus, Everett & Charleston for Boeing) also limit the delivering capability. Airlines often place huge bulk orders (Indigo’s 500 A320Neo deal, Emirates 200+ Boeing 777X) which strain delivery schedules. Delays ranging 2-7 years.

 

Partnerships

Partnerships and alliances are the invisible architecture of global aviation. They allow airlines to look global – but the real art is managing the tensions between reach and control, breadth and depth, competition, and cooperation.

What is Codeshare?

A Codeshare is when one airline sells seats on a flight operated by another airlines, using its own flight number and code

Example: A Flight physically operated by Qatar (QR) may also be sold by American Airlines (AA) under its own code as AA1234

Customer view: It looks like American flies to Doha, even though Qatar operates the aircraft

Why it matters:

·       Expands network reach without adding aircraft

·       Increases schedule choice and connectivity

·       Supports loyalty accrual/redemption across carriers

 

What is interlining?

An interline agreement is the most basic cooperation between airlines, allowing passengers to travel on a single ticket that involves multiple carriers

Example: A ticket from Auckland -> Singapore -> Nairobi, where the first leg is on Air New Zealand and the second on Ethiopian Airlines, is issued as one booking.

Customer view: You check in once, your baggage is tagged to you final destination, and if there is a delay, the airlines coordinate rebooking

Why it matters:

·       Simplifies global travel

·       Provides airlines with incremental connecting traffic

·       Reduces friction for passengers when multiple carriers are involved

 

In Short:

Codeshare = marketing & Sales partnership (One flight, multiple airline codes)

Interlining = Operational & ticketing cooperation (Multiple flights, one ticket, bags through-checked).

 

Alliance

What are Airlines Alliances?

Airlines alliances are formal partnerships among multiple carriers designed to extend network reach share resources, improve connectivity, coordinate loyalty benefits, and often reduce costs through joint purchasing and shared operations.

They differ from agreements (codeshares, JVs) because alliance membership tends to include shared service standards, frequent flyer reciprocity, lounge access, and sometimes co-marketing or schedule coordination.


 

The Big Three: Star Alliance, Oneworld, SkyTeam

Alliance

Founded

Key Features

Star Alliance

1997

The largest alliance by number of member airlines, destinations, and footprint. Strong in global coverage including Asia, Europe, Noth America, etc.

Oneworld

1999

Emphasis on premium customer experience. Long-haul networks, full service carriers.

SkyTeam

2000

Strong presence in transatlantic, Asis, Middle East, and growing markets.

 

Member Airlines by Alliance

#

Star Alliance

Oneworld

SkyTeam

1

Aegean Airlines

Alaska Airlines

Aerolineas Argentinas

2

Air Canada

American Airlines

Aeromexico

3

Air China

British Airways

Air Europa

4

Air India

Cathay Pacific

Air France

5

Air New Zealand

Fiji Airways

China Airlines

6

All Nippon Airways

Finnair

China Eastern Airlines

7

Asiana Airlines

Iberia

Delta Airlines

8

Austrian Airlines

Japan Airlines

Garuda Indonesia

9

Avianca

Malaysia Airlines

Kenya Airways

10

Brussels Airlines

Oman Air

KLM

11

Copa Airlines

Qantas

Korean Air

12

Croatia

Qatar Airways

Middle East Airlines

13

EgyptAir

Roual Air Maroc

Saudia

14

Ethiopian Airlines

Royal Jordanian

Scandinavian Airlines (SAS)

15

EVA Air

SriLankan Airlines

TAROM

16

LOT Polish Airlines

 

 

17

Lufthansa

 

 

18

Shenzhen Airlines

 

 

19

Singapore Airlines

 

 

20

Soth African Airways

 

 

21

SWISS International Airlines

 

 

22

TAP Air Portugal

 

 

23

Thai Airways International

 

 

24

Turkish Airlines

 

 

25

United Airlines

 

 

 

Alliance Membership usually includes

Membership Fees – Airlines pays for shared services such as alliance branding, IT integrations, lounge reciprocity, marketing

Integration Costs – Systems integration for booking, customer info, baggage handling, Loyalty (award flights, inter-program credit), IT infrastructure to support reservation codeshare/interline and frequent flyer reciprocity, Staff training and standardization to meet alliance quality/service standards

Operational Costs/Standards Maintenance – Meeting alliance standards for customer experience, lounge access, schedule reliability, baggage handling, etc. Ensuring interoperability with partner airlines (ground handling, partner aircraft, gates, priority check-in)

Benefit sharing – Alliance members often share revenue or costs in joint venture or codeshares

 

Joint Ventures (JVs): Deep cooperation where airlines share revenue and coordinate schedules on key markets

Example: Delts-Air France-KLM-Virgin Atlantic on transatlantic routes

·       Alliances also face limits

·       Not all members are equal

·       Ultra-LCCs and new mobility players sit outside these ecosystems

·       Airlines are increasingly preferring metal-neutral JVs and bilateral partnerships over relying purely on alliance membership

An airline must constantly balance control, reach and economics.

Strategic tensions in Airlines Partnerships & Alliances

1.       Control Vs Reach

·       The tension: The operating airlines controls service quality, punctuality, and reliability. If a partner underperforms, customers may still blame your airlines

2.       Exclusivity Vs Flexibility

·       The Tension: Locking into one alliance restricts the ability to partner broadly. Airlines sometimes exit alliances to regain freedom (e.g., LATAM leaving Oneworld after Delta investment)

3.       Global Alliances vs. Joint Ventures

·       The tension: JVs often matter more for economics(metal-neutral revenue sharing, schedule alignment), but are usually region-specific (e.g., transatlantic, transpacific)

4.       Cooperation Vs. Competition

·       The Tension: Members still compete head-to-head on key routes (e.g., United Vs. Lufthansa across Atlantic, both are star Alliance members)

5.       Standardization Vs. Differentiation

·       The Tension: Airlines also need to differentiate on price on benefit etc. What makes an Airline premium can be diluted if grouped with weaker partners

6.       Shared Revenue Vs. Unequal Contribution

·       The Tension: Not all members contribute equally. A hub carrier with prime slots (e.g., Heathrow or Frankfurt) adds disproportionate value compared to smaller regional members.

7.       Regulatory Approval Vs. Market Power

·       The Tension: Regulators scrutinize them for antitrust concerns. Airlines must balance alliance ambitions with the risk of regulatory limits.

Other strategic partnerships to note:

Global Distribution Systems (GDS) – Distribution Partners

What they are: Platforms like Amadeus, Sabre Travelport that connect airlines with travel agents, online travel agencies (OTAs), and corporate buyers.

How they function: They aggregate airline schedules, fares, and availability so agencies can book across multiple airlines seamlessly.

Partnership structure: Airlines sign distribution agreements with GDSs often negotiating content feed, NDC adoption, and merchandising flexibility.

Strategic Impact:

·       Extends sales reach into corporate and leisure agencies worldwide

·       Gives airlines access to segments they cannot efficiently serve direct

·       GDS costs are high

PSS(Passenger Service Systems) & Core IT – Selling, Pricing, Loyalty and Integration Partners

·       Providers like Amadeus (Altea), SabreSonic, Hitit, Radixx, Navitaire deliver the reservation, ticketing, departure control, and inventory systems airlines run on

·       Airlines form long-term technology partnerships, migrating PSS is expensive and risky

·       Example: Singapore Airlines runs on Amadeus Altea; Ryanair runs on Navitaire

 

NDC (New Distribution Capability) & ONE Order Ecosystems – New distribution, merchandising and personalization partners

·       Airlines increasingly partner with technology providers (Amadeus, Sabre, Travelport, Accelya, etc.) to implement IATA’s NDC standard -> enables retail-style selling (dynamic bundles, rich content)

Other key tech partnerships – Loyalty & Data Platforms, Retail & Payment Providers, Airport Systems Integration like SITA, Collins Aerospace, Amadeus for Check-in, baggage, biometrics etc.

These strategic partnerships directly impact:

·       Revenue capture (through distribution)

·       Customer experience (through booking and check-in systems)

·       Cost base (distribution fees, IT costs)

·       Competitive differentiation (How flexibility airlines retail and innovate)

Closing Thoughts

An Airline’s vision define its ambition, and its business model define how it plays – the network is the reality customers see. Airlines compete fiercely in the skies, but their true scale and resilience come from the partnerships they forge on the ground and across the ecosystem. Alliances expand global reach, codeshares and interlining stitch networks together, joint ventures unlock deep revenues synergies, and technology partners like GDSs and PSS providers determine how effectively airlines sell and serve, expand reach and retail capability.

In an industry shaped by high fixed costs, regulation, and volatility, no airlines can stand alone. Partnerships are not optional extras – they are the scaffolding that holds global aviation together, the enablers of connectivity, and the multipliers of strategic ambition.

No comments: