Skip to main content

Airlines Foundation Part 2: Vision, North Star & Business Model Choices


 

“Vision unlocks what was and what is to propel you into the land of what would be”

The complexity of airlines ecosystem is as such that not all airlines end up chasing the same dream.

In Part 1, we looked at the complexity of the ecosystem and the breadth of the global value chain. In this post, we look at the vision layer.

Vision defines the ambition. The North Star metrics tell if they are on track. The business model choices shape financial outcomes.

What is the vision in Airlines?

An Airlines vision sets its strategic purpose: Why it exists and how it wants to be seen.

Airlines operates at different contexts and their visions naturally emphasize different ambitions. Their priorities, their strategic alignment, stakeholder expectations and their clarity of differentiation all factor in.

Dimensions of airlines vision: National Identity/Flag carrier purpose, Premium brand positioning, Low-Cost democratization, Connector Hub vision, Sustainability Leadership, Customer Experience Disruptors, Cargo/Logistics Specialists

National Identity/Flag carrier purpose – Rooted in national pride and connectivity. Airlines are highly visible national symbols. Customers feel at home in their national airline, an emotional bond. They are strategic assets providing economic contribution to the nation, contributors to GDP. Government sees them as economic multipliers. Purpose of servicing the nation representing the nation abroad with safety, service and reputation.

Premium brand positioning – Product and Service excellence. Premium cabins can generate 2-3X more revenue per seat. In order to differentiate, a distinct identity where basic flying can feel like commodity. Premium traffic also promises luxury and better travel especially in the long-haul space, higher margins, stronger loyalty, corporate access, and brand power.

Low-Cost democratization – Affordable access for the masses. Historically, flying was for the wealthy or corporate travellers, by lowering fares airlines tap in to vast and under served customer base. Cheap fares stimulate demand and enable high-frequency flying. Champion of access. A downturn survival strategy. Sometimes bypass congested Hubs.

Connector Hub vision – Being the bridge between continents. Leverage the location or geographic advantage point, traffic aggregation helps with demand to fill the widebody aircraft efficiently, Hubs also allow for banked waves of flights – efficiencies in aircraft utilization, slot use etc. more destinations served with fewer aircrafts.

Sustainability Leadership – Decarbonization as the central narrative. Aviation faces mounting climate regulation ICAO’s CORSIA, EU’s Emissions trading system, New Zealand net-zero 2025 pledge, Get ahead of compliance, ESG is central to access to capital – Green bonds, financing terms, investor who screen for ESG, changing dynamic of customer and corporate mindset in terms of climate impact, carbon criteria in airline procurement, green fares, SAF contributions, carbon calculators, Innovation and Future proofing – SAF, Hydrogen, Electric etc. and be a new entrant competitive differentiator.

Customer Experience Disruptors: Redefining service or loyalty ecosystems. Differentiation in commoditized industry, reason to choose an airline, unique seating, inflight experience touches like Wi-Fi availability, better food options, Value innovation

Cargo/Logistics Specialists –Resilience in downturns such as reduction in passenger travel during COVID, High-Margin adjacency – Cargo, especially specialised freight can yield higher per kilo than passenger revenue per seat, urgent Cargo – Pharma, perishables etc. good alternative revenue stream, trade enabler, E-commerce & Integrator competition, Fleet utilization and Flexibility – Cargo Operations extend asset life, and better utilization of flight belly space

At the enterprise level, the articulation of an airlines vision is not simply an aspirational statement but a strategic anchor that cascades into financial architecture, capital allocation, balancing short-term volatility with long-term strategic differentiation and the overall risk posture. The breadth of strategic dimensions ultimately manifest in the airlines operating model, balance sheet resilience, and margin profile. In this way, the process of arriving at a vision is inseparable from shaping an airlines global mindset.

 

Let’s now look at the vision statement examples of few airlines:

Air New Zealand: “Creating the best flying experience on earth; enriching New Zealand by connecting its people to each other and the world”

Vision Anchor: Distinctive for blending customer experience and national identity and enrichment.

Singapore Airlines: “Providing air transportation of the highest Quality”

Vision Anchor: Premium, Service-led, product-innovation vision.

Qatar Airways: “Excellence in everything we do; to be the world’s best airline”

Vision Anchor: Global Hub premium carrier vision.

Ryanair: “Low fares, made simple – Europe’s greenest, cleanest airline”

Vision Anchor: Vision built around Ultra-low cost, efficiency, and Sustainability

Delta Airlines: “No one better connects the world”

Vision Anchor: Connector Hub, Scale, Reliability, loyalty monetisation.

Turkish Airlines: “To be the leading airline in the world with unrivalled flight network

Vision Anchor: Connectivity hub dominance

Air France KLM: “Towards more responsible travel while connecting France, the Netherlands and the world

              Vision Anchor: Sustainability led, premium-European dual Hub

United Airlines: “Connecting people. Uniting the world”.

              Vision Anchor: Global connectivity.

Lufthansa Group: “We connect people, cultures, and economies – Sustainably “

              Vision Anchor: Multi-brand ecosystem with sustainability leadership

Qantas: “The Spirit of Australia

              Vision Anchor: National Identity and Dual Brand strategy with Jetstar.

 

 Business model changes from the type of fleet it operates, to the routes it flies, the customers it targets, and the way it earns revenue beyond tickets (Loyalty, Cargo, Ancillaries). Vision shapes these choices directly: an airline that aspires to be a premium global brand will design a full-service model with widebodies, alliances, lounges and loyalty ecosystems, while a carrier whose vision is to democratize travel will build a lean low-cost model with high utilization single fleets, and unbundled fares. In this way, vision acts as the compass, and the business model becomes the operating blueprint that turns ambition into economic reality.

Business Model Choices & Financial Impact

Full-Service Carriers (FSCs): Airlines that offer a full suite of products – multiple cabin classes, Loyalty programs, Lounges, Global alliances, and both short- and long-haul flying. They balance premium service with scale, appealing to both corporate and leisure travellers. Margins rely on premium cabins and loyalty. They target both premium and mass markets and often carry national identity

Example: Singapore Airlines, Air New Zealand, Lufthansa

Direction: FSCs compete on service, scale and loyalty ecosystems.

Revenue: Passenger fares, Cargo, Loyalty

Strength: Premium Yields, Loyalty

Weakness: Complexity, High CASK

Financial Impact: Risk > CASK spead, reliant on premium cabins and Loyalty monetisation.

 

Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs): Airlines built on simplicity, efficiency, and low fares. Single-class cabins, quick turnarounds, high utilization, and stripped-down services form the backbone. Ancillaries like seat selection, bags and food drive profit. Thrive on volume, No frills, with Ultra-lean cost bases.

Example: Ryanair, Indigo, AirAsia.

Direction: LCCs win by keeping costs low and planes flying full.

Revenue: Ancillaries, high-density seating

Strength: Lowest CASK, high utilization

Weakness: Less diversification, vulnerable to fuel swings.

Financial Impact: Profitability driven by scale and ancillary revenue per pax.

 

Ultra-Low Cost Carriers (ULCCs): The extreme version of low cost. Base fares are rock bottom, everything else is sold separately. ULCCs maximise ancillary revenue, often earning more from extras than from tickets themselves. Model depends on ancillary revenue often making up 40% of total income.

Example: Spirit, Wiz Air, Viva Air

Direction: ULCCs turn flying in to supermarket of add-ons.

Revenue: Ancillary heavy

Strength: Extreme cost discipline

Weakness: Customer backlash, regulatory risk

Financial Impact: Thin fare yields offset by 40% and ancillary contribution.

 

Hybrid Carriers: Airlines that mix low-cost DNA with selective premium features. They may offer extra legroom cabins, business class products on key routes, or loyalty programs, while still operating leaner than legacy FSCs. Mix elements of FSCs and LCCs, positioned to attract both budget and value seeking premium travellers.

Example: JetBlue, WestJet, Virgin Australia

Direction: Hybrids balance value with experience – but must avoid identity confusion.

Revenue: Mix of LCC fares and premium cabins

Strength: Flexibility, brand appeal

Weakness: Identity risk, margin dilution

Financial Impact: Mid-Point margins, must avoid complexity creep

 

Group Multi-Brand Models: Airline holding companies that manage a portfolio of brands – often combining FSCs, LCCs, and Cargo arms under one umbrella. This diversification helps them serve different markets and spread risk. Holding companies that manage both FSCs and LCCs. Spread risk across segments and markets but face integration complexity.

Example: IAG(BA, Iberia, Vueling, Aer Lingus), Lufthansa Group, Air France-KLM

Direction: Groups compete by being more than one airline at once.

Revenue: Diversified portfolios (FSC + LCC, Loyalty + MRO + Cargo)

Strength: Risk diversification, Synergies

Weakness: Integration Complexity

Financial Impact: More Resilient to shocks, but integration costs eat margin.

 

Cargo/Integrator Specialists: Carriers dedicated to freight or specialised aviation services. They thrive in Cargo-intensive markets (e-commerce, Pharmaceuticals) or provide niche services like charters, business jets, or integrator-style logistics.

Example: FedEx, Qatar Airways Cargo, Atlas Air, Korean Air Cargo

Direction: Cargo carriers keep the world’s goods moving – often more profitable than passengers.

Revenue: Freight tonnage

Strength: Resilience in downturns, e-commerce growth

Weakness: Cyclical with trade volumes

Financial Impact: Can deliver higher margins than passenger airlines in down cycles.

 

Closing Thought:

Vision gives airlines their north star, North Stars define the scorecard, Business model choices turn that vision into financial reality

Airlines succeed or fail not just on operational excellence, but on the clarity of their vision, the sharpness of their business model choices, and the focus on their North Star. A vision sets the ambition, a business model defines the playbook, and the North Star keeps the airline honest about whether it is delivering on both. Some airlines choose global connectors, others democratizers of travel, and others champions of premium service or sustainability. Each path comes with trade-offs Scale versus focus, cost versus experience, growth versus resilience. The real test is not in choosing everything but in choosing decisively and aligning every part of the enterprise to that choice.

In Part 3, we will explore how these visions are operationalised.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mongo Learning Series 1

Mongo Learning First of all, I want to thank and congratulate the MongoDB team for hosting such a wonderful introductory interactive course.  Good job guys. For those interested here is the url https://education.mongodb.com/ It is a 7 week course. The syllabus follows: Week 1: Introduction Introduction & Overview - Overview, Design Goals, the Mongo Shell, JSON Intro, installing tools, overview of blog project. Bottle, Pymongo Week 2: CRUD CRUD (Creating, Reading and Updating Data) - Mongo shell, query operators, update operators and a few commands Week 3: Schema Design Schema Design - Patterns, case studies and tradeoffs Week 4: Performance Using indexes, monitoring and understanding performance. Performance in sharded environments. Week 5: Aggregation Framework Goals, the use of the pipeline...

TechSharp [T#] Going beyond Architecture Center of Excellence

Consulting Services companies goes through multitude of challenges in its Sales cycle, Delivery Cycle and over all Competency building and maintaining cycle. In this 2 part blog, I write about the various issues, Well whats the point in discussing problems with out a solution, Worry Not, The blog culminates with a tried and tested solution. Tried Architecture as Shared Services? Felt like Abstracting the best of the resources, while encapsulating them well within at the same time? Tried creating COE’s?  Have the management shot back stating it is overused/abused concept, tried and failed? Yes there are lot of reasons to fail when NOT done right. This blog entry documents the RIGHT way, tried and tested Recursively. Introduction What is TechSharp? Why do we need it? Is it an Architecture center of excellence? What is its significance? What issues does it resolve or even prevent from happening in the first place? Who benefits from it? What are the levels of Archi...
Continued . . Part 1 How it all fits together [Solution] Technology positioning system’s [TPS] output forms the key to the organizations focus, TechSharp will work on the trending Languages, Frameworks, Techniques, Tools, and Platforms across domains in the IT industry, and identify the right ones for the organization to adopt. This data will be used to propose and implement solution for new projects by the delivery teams. Sales force will use this data to sell the organizations capabilities. TPS will also align with the sales pipeline outliers, and form a combined Technology positioning for the organization. Imagine the possibilities of leveraging this data.. The Recruitment team can use this data to plan their hiring. They leverage TechSharp to put together the JD’s for the technologies. The LEAD team has a clear technology training focus. Delivery team can plan bench or recommend up skilling of existing str...