Skip to main content

Diversification Story Series 2:Samsung: From Trading Company to Global Conglomerate

 


In 1938, in a small town in Korea, Lee Byung-chul founded Samsung as a trading company that sold dried fish, noodles, and groceries. Few could have imagined that this modest start would grow into one of the most diversified and powerful conglomerates in the world. Samsung’s story is not just one of scale — it is a case study in relentless diversification, guided by discipline, bold bets, and the courage to divest when necessary.

Horizon 1: The Core – Building the Foundation

Samsung’s early decades were about building a base in Korea’s industrial economy. From trading, it expanded into textiles and food processing. By the 1960s and 70s, Samsung moved into consumer electronics — black-and-white televisions, home appliances, and semiconductors.

This was Samsung’s first horizon: establish a strong and profitable foundation in products essential to everyday life. Its televisions, refrigerators, and washing machines became household names in Asia, then globally. By the 1990s, mobile phones were added to this core — laying the groundwork for Samsung’s position as one of the world’s largest consumer electronics brands.

Lesson: Use the core to build scale, brand trust, and financial stability.

Horizon 2: Growth – Expanding Adjacencies

By the late 20th century, Samsung wasn’t content with being an electronics maker. It pushed into adjacent industries where its capabilities — scale, technology, engineering — could dominate.

  • Semiconductors (1980s–1990s): Samsung invested heavily in memory chips and processors, eventually becoming a global leader. Today, semiconductors are one of Samsung’s largest revenue streams.
  • Shipbuilding and Construction: Through Samsung Heavy Industries and Samsung C&T, it entered infrastructure, engineering, and mega-projects worldwide.
  • Financial Services: Samsung Life Insurance, Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance, and Samsung Card made it a financial powerhouse in Korea.
  • Display Technology: From LCD panels to OLED, Samsung expanded into components that powered not only its own devices but also those of competitors like Apple.

Lesson: Growth came from adjacencies that leveraged Samsung’s industrial capabilities, spreading risk across industries while building synergies.

Horizon 3: Transform – Betting on the Future

In the 21st century, Samsung began planting transformational bets in entirely new frontiers:

  • Biotech & Healthcare: Through Samsung Biologics and Samsung Bioepis, it entered biopharmaceutical manufacturing — today a multibillion-dollar growth engine.
  • Artificial Intelligence & 5G: Heavy investments in AI research, smart devices, and next-generation networks.
  • Renewable Energy & Batteries: Aiming to lead in sustainable technologies for the future of energy and mobility.

These moves represent Samsung’s third horizon — businesses that could redefine its role in the global economy decades from now.

Lesson: Transformational bets ensure longevity beyond today’s consumer cycles.

When Diversification Fails

Samsung’s diversification story is remarkable, but not every venture succeeded. The company shows discipline in pruning businesses that no longer fit or failed to scale.

  • Samsung Motors (1994–2000): Attempted to enter the automobile industry but faced losses; sold to Renault (now Renault Samsung Motors).
  • Samsung Techwin (Defense & Cameras, divested 2014): Exited defense technology and optics, sold to Hanwha Group.
  • Samsung Petrochemicals & General Chemicals (divested 2015): Sold to Hanwha as part of restructuring.
  • Printing Business (divested 2016): Sold entire division to HP for $1.05B, recognizing commoditization.
  • Plasma TV Production (shut 2014): Discontinued as LCD and OLED became dominant.

Lesson: Diversification requires courage not only to enter but also to exit. Samsung shed businesses that diluted focus, reallocating capital to stronger growth areas.

The Mindset Behind Samsung’s Diversification

Samsung’s journey shows a mindset of bold ambition balanced by pragmatism:

  • Core strength first: Build consumer trust with electronics and phones.
  • Adjacency expansion: Use industrial, financial, and technological capabilities to grow across sectors.
  • Transformational bets: Invest early in biotech, AI, and renewable energy to prepare for the next era.

Closing Thought

From dried fish to smartphones, from textiles to biotech, Samsung’s story is one of audacious diversification. It invested where it had strength, divested where commoditization eroded margins, and never stopped betting on the future. Some ventures failed, but others reshaped industries. A century on, Samsung stands not just as Korea’s most powerful conglomerate, but as a global case study in how disciplined diversification across horizons can transform a trading company into a world leader.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mongo Learning Series 1

Mongo Learning First of all, I want to thank and congratulate the MongoDB team for hosting such a wonderful introductory interactive course.  Good job guys. For those interested here is the url https://education.mongodb.com/ It is a 7 week course. The syllabus follows: Week 1: Introduction Introduction & Overview - Overview, Design Goals, the Mongo Shell, JSON Intro, installing tools, overview of blog project. Bottle, Pymongo Week 2: CRUD CRUD (Creating, Reading and Updating Data) - Mongo shell, query operators, update operators and a few commands Week 3: Schema Design Schema Design - Patterns, case studies and tradeoffs Week 4: Performance Using indexes, monitoring and understanding performance. Performance in sharded environments. Week 5: Aggregation Framework Goals, the use of the pipeline...
Post a Comment
Read more

TechSharp [T#] Going beyond Architecture Center of Excellence

Consulting Services companies goes through multitude of challenges in its Sales cycle, Delivery Cycle and over all Competency building and maintaining cycle. In this 2 part blog, I write about the various issues, Well whats the point in discussing problems with out a solution, Worry Not, The blog culminates with a tried and tested solution. Tried Architecture as Shared Services? Felt like Abstracting the best of the resources, while encapsulating them well within at the same time? Tried creating COE’s?  Have the management shot back stating it is overused/abused concept, tried and failed? Yes there are lot of reasons to fail when NOT done right. This blog entry documents the RIGHT way, tried and tested Recursively. Introduction What is TechSharp? Why do we need it? Is it an Architecture center of excellence? What is its significance? What issues does it resolve or even prevent from happening in the first place? Who benefits from it? What are the levels of Archi...
Post a Comment
Read more
Continued . . Part 1 How it all fits together [Solution] Technology positioning system’s [TPS] output forms the key to the organizations focus, TechSharp will work on the trending Languages, Frameworks, Techniques, Tools, and Platforms across domains in the IT industry, and identify the right ones for the organization to adopt. This data will be used to propose and implement solution for new projects by the delivery teams. Sales force will use this data to sell the organizations capabilities. TPS will also align with the sales pipeline outliers, and form a combined Technology positioning for the organization. Imagine the possibilities of leveraging this data.. The Recruitment team can use this data to plan their hiring. They leverage TechSharp to put together the JD’s for the technologies. The LEAD team has a clear technology training focus. Delivery team can plan bench or recommend up skilling of existing str...
Post a Comment
Read more